Bidding with documents that do not fit is taking a risk nobody will pay you for. We review drawings, specifications and disciplines and tell you what does not match before you sign.
Inconsistencies between architecture, structure and MEP are rarely visible in 2D documents. They show up on site, when there is no margin left: extras the client will not recognise, delayed schedules and rework paid by the contractor.
That what is drawn and what is specified say the same thing.
What does not fit where it is drawn.
If the tender requires BIM, what you are really committing to.
Each finding with its location, likely impact on cost or schedule and risk level, ranked from highest to lowest.
The questions to ask the client or in the tender query round, drafted and numbered.
The timeframe depends on the volume of documents and is agreed on receipt. For a mid-sized project it usually takes a few business days, counted from when we have all the documents.
technical queries and 6 inconsistencies resolved before manufacturing, none visible in the 2D tender drawings.
PB Leiner industrial building · under constructiontechnical communications traced between site, inspection and specialists.
Santa Fe Sur Police Station · COCYAR · under constructionyears on site behind every review: design, supervision and coordination.
Bertone & NievaSend us the documents and we will tell you when we can return the report.
No. We review 2D documents, models or a combination of both. If needed, we model the critical areas to check them.
No. We point out what does not fit and why; design solutions belong to their authors. Our report helps you ask in time and bid with information.
The review is the natural starting point for BIM coordination of the project: work already done is not repeated.